
I bought
Brand New Sin's album Tequila from
iTunes today. I hadn't heard any of the songs before I downloaded it, but I like
Brand New Sin and assumed that they've stayed their previous course, music wise. The album was alright I suppose, although I haven't really gotten in to it yet.
Some
moron acting on
iTunes behalf decided to save some precious megabytes by converting the album into
AAC 128
kbit/s. I couldn't even make it through one song on the
Shuffle with my
Sennheiser HD 215, it sounded like
crap. The left/right balance was all screwed up, the bass seems to "leak" into the background creating a dulled/muffled sound. In summation; grainy and headache inducing. There is some debate as to the quality of the 128
kbit/s
AAC, some claim it is comparable to 192
kbit/s mp3, but in this case either the
AAC 128
kbit/s sucks or someone
screwed up while
ripping the CD. All I know is that the sound quality and dynamics was shot to
hell and quite frankly is a
pain to listen to.
[update]
It seems
iTunes wasn't the only culprit in the "Tequila" affair.
Yes, the 128
AAC bitrate is too low but as I listened to a higher
bitrate copy of the album the dynamics still sounded screwed up - at least I think so. It sounds just like someone crossed the left/right channel, or like one of those cheesy 3D equalizer modes. This applies mostly to the instruments, the singing still sounds
OK. I'm not sure what kind of "sound" they were aiming for, but I don't like it.
[/update]
Viable options for me right now is probably to download a
pirate (
here's a link in reference to the previous one) copy of the CD since I've already payed for it. Shoplifting is kind of extreme, even though certain propaganda proclaim
piracy comparable to shoplifting. Let me explain why that is a rather
poor analogy.
A product (CD,DVD, tape...) needs to be produced i.e. made from materials, electronic information are not made of physical particles (well...) i.e. no reproduction cost (worth mentioning anyways). That means that while
piracy is arguably "not a very nice thing to do" it does NOT represent a loss for any retailer, just a reduced income.
Let's compare shoplifting to piracy in a practical example. Say that you shoplift a CD, you naughty person you. The expense for the music shop you just fleeced is the cost for the shop to buy the CD and the loss of income should it have been sold. Say instead that you've downloaded the album. This would in comparison mean that the shop has a reduced income of one sold CD, BUT the CD hasn't gone away. It is still there and can be sold to someone else. Naturally if everyone downloaded their music illegally there would be serious repercussions for the music
industry, but my point is that piracy is not comparable to shoplifting, no matter what your TV tells you.
Labels: audio